Statement By  Ronald E Hutton
Professor of History
Bristol University

This witness statement was prepared for the trial of Arthur Pendragon at Southwark Crown Court, November 1997, regarding Arthur’s right to carry the sword Excalibur.

Virtually everybody in the Western world has heard of the Druids, they are part of the common cultural inheritance of our civilisation. This familiarity is increased, rather than diminished, by the fact that the ‘original’ Druids, of the Celtic Iron Age, remain such shadowy figures.

We can say with confidence that they were the public magicians, soothsayers, religious experts and political and judicial arbitrators of the tribes of north-western Europe at the time when history begins in this region; about two thousand years ago.

It is also fairly certain that Britain was recognised as their their original homeland, in which the system of thought and action which they represented was first developed. Beyond these facts, however we run up against the problem that since their own teachings were never committed to writing, we possess no sources produced by Druids themselves.

Instead , we depend on views of them developed by outsiders, either contemporary Greek or Roman writers, or those later Christian Middle Ages; and these varied wildly according to the prejudices and propaganda needs of the authors concerned.

There is thus no ‘authentic’ original Druidry against which later Druids can be judged; rather, Druids are powerful symbolic figures, which have been appropriated and re-imagined in different ways by successive generations ever since ancient times, That is their true power to move the imagination.

In the eighteenth century Age of Reason they were most commonly seen as rational, pacific and patriotic thinkers who combined rigorous training and close observation of nature to produce a reasonable and benevolent religion which reconciled God, humanity and the other parts of creation in a harmonious system.

From this time sprang a succession of modern Druid orders, some of which survive to the present day, dedicated to the task of putting together the wisdom of all the worlds’ great religions, within a single framework with a distinctively British character.

Since the mid-1980’as set of new Druid groups have appeared, which are devoted to the work of developing a new spirituality based upon the traditions, monuments and landscapes of the British Isles.

I have been studying these intensively since 1991 as part of a research project into such new ‘native’ religious movements. Arthur Pendragon is one of the most Prominent and most significant, figures within them.

The groups concerned number just over 6,000 (Ed: over 15,000 with recent affiliations) individuals between them and are growing fast; furthermore, the ideas and images they represent are rapidly spreading among British youth and among specific sub-cultures such as New Age Travellers. They all have in common a powerful reverence for the land of Britain as something sacred in itself, with this sanctity especially concentrated in certain places such as Stonehenge.

All are also dedicated to improving the spiritual quality of life of the British, by assisting people to greater self knowledge, to a still more positive set of relationships with each other and with the natural environment and to a greater personal freedom, within a framework of social responsibility.

All, therefore, feel compelled by their beliefs to oppose specific projects which damage places of natural beauty and historic significance, such as particular road-building schemes and quarries, and to safeguard or extend civil liberties. All are committed to a pacifist ethic which condemns violence and prefers to campaign by employing moral pressure and drawing public attention to the issues at stake.

From that point onward, however, practice between both groups and individuals diverge considerably. Some adopt a quietest stance, preferring to advance their ideals through meditation and personal example. Others prefer to take part in direct and public political action, including demonstrations and protest camps built on the route of controversial developments. Arthur Pendragon is one of the most important of the later.

Before concentrating on him, it may be helpful to emphasise that Druids of his kind are contributing to debates which involve a much larger cross-section of the national community and are commonly recognised to possess a great deal of validity.

Their religious ideals represent only one part of a constellation of movements, some within established traditions such as Christianity and some outside them, which are striving to develop a spirituality which is more feminist, more sensitive to environmental issues and more dedicated to individual freedom and personal growth, than those which have prevailed in recent centuries.

The specific issue of access to Stonehenge has divided the community of professional archaeologists in the past few years, with some of the most respected figures joining the Druids in arguing for reopening the monument at the key solar festivals with which it is associated.

The controversy over national transport policy and the road building schemes which are the main feature of the current one, has involved a very large number of people and range of ideologies and interests. The question of who owns the land and who may have access to it or should be concerned in its preservation, had generated another major debate in the past two decades.

The new Druids and especially those involved in direct action such as Arthur, are therefore not fringe figures with ideals and preoccupation's detached from those of a wider national community, but some of the more colourful contributors to a set of arguments and activities which involves a large part of that community. Now to Arthur Pendragon himself. I first saw him in person in May 1993 adopt a quietest stance, preferring to and have been observing him at regular and frequent intervals ever since. It would be impossible for me to conduct my present study without doing so, because he is such a major and respected figure among the new Druid groups.

Indeed, he holds formal office in no less than three, being the Pendragon of the Glastonbury Order of Druids and the Swordbearer of the Secular Order of Druids, as well as leading his own order, the Loyal Arthurian Warband, as chief. These represent between them, the three groups most heavily involved in direct political campaigning.

Although a strong mutual respect has developed between us, it would be stretching this too far to term us as friends. My opinion of him therefore reflects my own viewpoint as an onlooker and an academic scholar.

He is clearly a sincere natural mystic, whose very strong libertarian political convictions are bound up with a sense of guidance by supernatural forces. His belief in reincarnation was stimulated by the experience of vivid dreams and reveries, known since childhood, which seemed to him to be memories of previous lifetimes.

His assumption of the identity of King Arthur, in 1987, was precipitated by a series if apparent signs and omens. His love of the land is charged by his belief (shared by hundreds of thousands of modern Pagans in Europe and North America) that  it is sacred in itself and represents a living entity, most often called Gaia, Mother Earth, or, (to Arthur as for many others) The Goddess.

In taking up this identity, he has identified with a well known legend that Arthur and his knights are not dead but sleeping in a cavern, from which they awake when the land is in danger. Hitherto, that has usually been interpreted as signifying an external danger (from foreign invaders), needing a military response.

To Arthur and his comrades, it is an internal danger, from pollution, destruction by needless building or digging programmes and the erosion of civil rights and demands of a non-violent response of demonstration and the building of public opinion. It is to that they have dedicated themselves.

The Loyal Arthurian Warband, over which he presides, is now one of the largest modern Druid orders and is divided into three levels or circles according to the degree of commitment desired of its members.

Its members define themselves by swearing to three things. To tell the truth, to uphold honour and to fight for justice. The first is fundamental, as it is believed that insincerity and dishonesty corrode the bonds of the Warband and destroy any hopes it has of winning and retaining the public esteem.

It also carries the connotation that only displaying the highest personal probity (as ‘knights’) can the Warband’s people prove themselves worthy of the causes for which they campaign. Honour and justice are combined in those causes, by the perceived need to defend the land against damage or destruction and civil liberties and human rights -a category extended upon occasion to include workers’ rights against encroachment.

The language is chivalric and military, but the ethics of the Warband remain pacifist and its members are expected only non-violent direct action. In its passive form, this consists of putting their bodies in the way of developers until dragged aside. In its active one, it takes the form of digging tunnels or building tree-walks in the path of proposed development and trying to evade capture and joining protest meetings and marches. These activities are, of course, common to many other groups concerned with the same causes.

The central emblem of the Loyal Arthurian Warband is the ceremonial sword, which Arthur himself has carried from 1987 until its confiscation by the Police upon April 12 1997. He identifies it with the original Excalibur of the Arthurian legends. It has been used to dub knights of the Band, which is the formal rite of admission to the group, and oaths are taken upon it in other ritual contexts.

The latter include marriage ceremonies of members of the group and of their friends, solemn undertakings to carry out particular tasks and, (on one occasion) the formal affirmation to tell the truth in a Crown Court.  I have myself witnessed examples of all these different kinds of proceeding.

The use of swords in such contexts is, of course, itself a mediaeval tradition, but the symbolism has been reinforced in modern times by the related tradition of high ceremonial magic, as developed in the nineteenth century by the French occultist Eliphas Levi and the British Order of the Golden Dawn.

Within this, a sword represents the human will, which is expected for solemn purposes to be as strong and straight as the blade and pure as the steel of which it it is made.   A related aspect of this tradition is that a sword used in a sacred and ritual context is polluted by being used for violence and indeed, upon none of the scores of occasions upon which I have closely  watched or interviewed Arthur Pendragon have I notified any suggestion that he does not hold to this rule.

The legendary Excalibur was a fighting weapon, employed in battle; this one functions in virtually the opposite role, as a purely symbolic object, comparable to the four swords carried in the coronation ceremony of British monarchs, or to the maces of town councils, universities and of the House of Commons.

Precisely the same considerations apply to the ceremonial dagger carried by Arthur Pendragon until its confiscation by the Police upon the same date.

In the Western tradition of ritual magic, described above, the dagger functions as a miniature equivalent to the sword and likewise represents the human will.  It is often deployed in a magical context for which a sword would be unwieldy, such as drawing sacred signs upon the air, but it also functions in a more practical role, of cutting herbs, plants  and flowers used for medicines or as ritual decorations and symbols.

The most celebrated example of this in Druid tradition is the ritual gathering of mistletoe.  I have seen Arthur employ his own ceremonial dagger in this latter capacity and for no other purpose.

It may be helpful in the context to note that a black handled ritual knife, known as an Athame, has become the prime symbol and ceremonial object of the modern Pagan religion of Wicca, drawing upon the same body of tradition, no Wiccan can practice his or her religion without the possession of one.

A curious and paradoxical aspect of Arthur Pendragon's role is that he has adopted the trappings and persona of mediaeval monarch and his companions the identity of mediaeval knights, as part of a cultural movement which in general dislikes authority figures and hierarchies and prefers an ethic of communal work and comradeship.

The paradox is resolved by Arthur's consistent refusal to be treated as a guru or cult leader by the Warband and its allies.  I have repeatedly seen him use his considerable sense of humour to divert or deflate attempts to give him this sort of stature and this behaviour is the best illustration of an important feature of the Loyal Arthurian Warband which has contributed considerably to the success with which it has functioned.

On the other hand, as indicated above, Arthur and its other members are genuine mystics and visionaries, who take the causes to which they have dedicated themselves very seriously indeed.  On the other, they go to some lengths to avoid taking themselves too seriously and so acquiring  the disposition of fanatics; there is a great element of playfulness and parody in their self-image. 

Their identity as Arthurian knights lends to their activities something of the atmosphere of carnival and street theatre and it has the undoubted practical advantage of attracting and holding the attention of the mass media and therefore of the public, in a which more conventional and less colourful protesters do not have. 

In this respect they stand firmly in another tradition of British popular political movements associated  with a fancy dress which gives drama and adds meaning to protest, examples between 1600 and 1900 include Captain Pouch, Lady Skimmington, the Waltham Blacks,  the Scotch Cattle, and the Hosts of Rebecca.  This is a distinguished company and the Loyal Arthurian Warband very clearly represents a modern continuation of it.

A contemporary historian has therefore, to take Arthur Pendragon seriously.  Upon the one hand he is a major figure in modern Druidry, leading one of the largest orders and representing a distinctive form of spirituality.

On the other, he has an equally important place in the history of groups concerned with environmental issues and civil rights.  It is an impressive duel achievement.

ooOoo